Rubric for Evaluating Topic Paper

 

Criteria  1 2 3 4 Points
Flow of the Report   The report appears to have no direction. In general, it is disjointed. There is a basic flow from one paragraph to the next, but not all paragraphs follow in a logical order.   There is a basic flow from one paragraph to the next. In general, it follows in a logical order.   The report goes from general ideas to specific conclusions. Transitions tie paragraphs together well.    
Coverage of Content The topic is of little significance to the content. Major sections of relevant content have been omitted.   All major sections of the relevant content are included, but not covered as explicitly as expected.   All major sections of the relevant content are included. Topic is significant to the content, but the content is redundant.   The appropriate content in consideration is covered in depth without being redundant. The topic is significant to the content.    
Clarity of Writing   Misspelled words, improper punctuation, and incorrect grammar are used. It is hard to know what the paper implies. Unnecessary words are used, but writing is generally clear. Paragraph structure is too repetitive.   Writing is clear. Proper punctuation and grammar used, but meaning is sometimes hidden.   Writing is clear and succinct. It is evident what the writer is trying to express. Grammar and punctuation are used appropriately.    
Synthesis of Ideas   The conclusion of the report is not written based on the review. The report does not synthesize the information.   The conclusion of the report is written based on the review. However, the report doesn't provide concluding remarks that show synthesis of ideas occurred.   The report provides concluding remarks that show an analysis and synthesis of ideas occurred. However, some of the conclusions are not supported in the body of the report.   The report has succinct and precise conclusions based on the review. Also, the report provides concluding remarks that show an analysis and synthesis of ideas occurred.    
References   References for the statements included in the report are not provided.   A corresponding reference list is presented, but some components are missing.   A corresponding reference list is provided. APA format is used appropriately, but some formatting problems exist.   References match all needed citations, and all are encoded in APA format.    
Total Points
 


The University of Texas at Austin 
For comments or more information, please e-mail us at cscl2005_instructor@teachnet.edb.utexas.edu.  
© 2005 Paul E. Resta